A633.5.3.RB - Reflections on Chaos
I took this assignment running because this was the perfect
exercise I used with half of my company in unit. I am in the headquarters
headquarters company and took personnel from the different sections and applied
this exercise. I will not lie this what quite difficult to make them understand
what I was trying to do, but I had to thank them for their efforts. I brought
my commander out in this exercise and showed him how complex systems operate,
the chaos theory, and share the learning process of this course. This exercise
showed me that no matter how different the personalities are in an organization
a complex system can always set a tone and control situations moving forward.
Sull & Eisenhardt (2012) stated that “Once they understood the rules and
their underlying rationale, ALL employees generated a series of innovative
proposals based on what they had to work with.” (p. 3)
My soldiers dealt with what
they had to work with which was minimal guidance and minimal understanding of
my objective. The pieces were moved and in place during the exercise. Obolensky
(2014) discusses the 8 principles of unifying a common purpose, clear explicit
individual objectives, the freedom to act, boundaries, skill/will of an
individual, few rules, ambiguity, and unambiguous feedback. (p.2422) I used
this as my gage during this exercise.
I have come to realize that my organization (although highly
structured being that it is a military component) is that as complex as the
organization is, there is really minimal directive needed to accomplish a task.
When the soldier were able to move themselves in the positions they were it
showed me that things can fluidly move into place. Collins (1999) discusses
about BHAG, which stands for “Big, Hairy, Audacious goals.” (p. 3) As he
discusses this concept he explains an example of climbing Mt. Everest and
contemplating how you’re you going to climb the mountain then BHAG does not
exist, which is how I interpreted this exercise as well. To me this ties into
the implications of strategy by seeing your organizations goal and moving
forward with it instead of just contemplating about it.
Giving my soldiers the boundaries yet freedom to act by them
choosing the two individuals also brought this to some clarity. Hirschorn &
Gilmore (1992) wrote, “Yet knowing how to recognize these new
boundaries and use them productively is the essence of management in the
flexible organization.”
With this exercise the moving pieces at a slow pace,
notifying their left and right limits of space, and lining parallel with their
two subjects represents this idea. No matter how they lined up it was their
decision on how they wanted to it. After this activity understanding Chaos
theory has showed me a new way of understanding human relationships, opening up
a new dynamic of leadership, and implementing new exercises in understanding
how an organization works.
References:
Collins, J. (1999). Turning Goals Into Results: The Power of
Catalytic Mechanisms Harvard Business Review, 77(4), 70-82.
Hirschhorn, L., & Gilmore, T. (1992). The New Boundaries
of the 'Boundaryless' Company Harvard Business Review, 70(3), 104-115.
Obolensky, N. (2014). Complex adaptive leadership
(2nd ed.). Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited
Sull, D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2012). Simple rules for a
complex world. Harvard Business Review, 90(9), 68-74
No comments:
Post a Comment